Comments on: Apple Auto – Titanic task https://www.radiofreemobile.com/apple-auto-titanic-task/ To entertain as well as inform Fri, 18 Apr 2025 06:25:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.26 By: David Knepprath https://www.radiofreemobile.com/apple-auto-titanic-task/#comment-1101 Mon, 02 May 2016 18:38:03 +0000 http://www.radiofreemobile.com/?p=3284#comment-1101 Services has traditionally not been Apple’s forte, but neither were portable media players or phones.

Services is clearly tracking into their crosshairs: https://mondaynote.com/apple-surprises-numbers-culture-structure-f48a5e14c767#.aqmp8hc0t

And when has Apple ever got there first? Definitely not with portable media players or phones.

]]>
By: windsorr https://www.radiofreemobile.com/apple-auto-titanic-task/#comment-1100 Wed, 27 Apr 2016 08:35:38 +0000 http://www.radiofreemobile.com/?p=3284#comment-1100 Then that is a completely different porposition.
However I would say the following:
1) Services are not Apple’s forte
2) Uber likely to get there first.

I think autonomous vehicles will not be reality before 2030.

]]>
By: David K https://www.radiofreemobile.com/apple-auto-titanic-task/#comment-1099 Wed, 27 Apr 2016 04:05:10 +0000 http://www.radiofreemobile.com/?p=3284#comment-1099 A big assumption in your analysis is that Apples go-to-market strategy is the same as existing automakers.

What if Apple sells a premium door-to-door transportation service to consumers, not the vehicle itself? What kind of margins can you have on an autonomous vehicle service that has > 90% utilization, as opposed to < 10% utilization of costly and cumbersome vehicle ownership?

All indications I have seen is that Apple is not targeting a product release before 2020, that gives time for autonomous tech and regulation to mature.

]]>