Comments on: IPR: Samsung vs. Apple – Far from done https://www.radiofreemobile.com/ipr-samsung-vs-apple-far-from-done/ To entertain as well as inform Fri, 18 Apr 2025 06:25:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.26 By: windsorr https://www.radiofreemobile.com/ipr-samsung-vs-apple-far-from-done/#comment-573 Mon, 25 Nov 2013 06:03:16 +0000 http://www.radiofreemobile.com/?p=1315#comment-573 I agree….settlement will be best for both…very little chance of that happening anytime soon tho!!…

]]>
By: Tatilsever https://www.radiofreemobile.com/ipr-samsung-vs-apple-far-from-done/#comment-572 Fri, 22 Nov 2013 07:45:55 +0000 http://www.radiofreemobile.com/?p=1315#comment-572 > “The purpose of the patent system is to allow an innovator to recoup his investment via the grant of a temporary monopoly.”
> “With the way the US patent system currently operates, this goal can never be met […]”
The goal is met pretty well when it is a large company against a small one or a non-practicing entity against any size actual ones. 🙂

Now that Samsung phones do not look like cheap iPhone knock-offs anymore and the first lawsuit reached its resolution at the district level, an amicable settlement can easily be reached through a lump sum payment, a royalty stream and a no-cloning agreement. Samsung management could argue copying was necessary and beneficial in a business sense during its early efforts before its designs reached maturity, (as in totally worth the price) and Apple could get its vindication and claim that its aggressive efforts forced the competition to abandon blatant clones. Win win. Of course, I am not the executive who needs to sign off on a check worth billions of dollars.

]]>