Comments on: Vertical industry – Monkey business https://www.radiofreemobile.com/vertical-industry-monkey-business/ To entertain as well as inform Fri, 18 Apr 2025 06:25:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.26 By: tatilsever https://www.radiofreemobile.com/vertical-industry-monkey-business/#comment-558 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:38:38 +0000 http://www.radiofreemobile.com/?p=1246#comment-558 The great theory dictates that as an industry matures, growth starts to taper. Companies start competing against each other rather than non-consumption, so they start consolidating through mergers and bankruptcies to create economies of scale and they start addressing niche areas to grow the addressable market and for differentiation on factors other than price. Of course, niche products with lower volumes are supposed to be sold at higher margin to make it a worthwhile endeavor. Yet, that is not quite what happened in PC industry. Critical component suppliers (OS, CPU, GPU) consolidated very quickly and a few came to dominate each field very early on, before a corresponding consolidation in OEMs. For every company that got out of the business, a new sucker came in all too happy to sell products at just above cost, as the suppliers managed to keep development costs and the barriers to entry low for OEMs through reference designs. Differentiation opportunities for OEMs were limited due to the unimaginatively similar form factors and the limited number of performance parameters they could modify (CPU code number, size of screen, RAM, hard disk and not much else).

We’ll see if a similar development will take place in smartphones. Despite the similar hardware form factors, (thanks to ARM’s licensing based business model) there are a number of CPU/GPU possibilities and (thanks to Google’s willingness) OEMs are able and willing to customize the OS and the user interface. Consolidation of OEMs at the high end of the market, with Apple and Samsung as the only major players, have been faster than suppliers. The basis of competition there may not boil down to just price, making customization and better integration (along with distribution, supply chain and marketing heft) more valuable than a slight rise in costs, keeping the vertically integrated model viable. At the low end, there are a lot more OEMs willing to live with low margins, so they may be willing to buy their components in the open market for any penny of savings, but competition among suppliers have been quite lively as well. This market may lead to low margins on both sides of the table. With such a dynamic, neither MediaTek’s volumes, nor its profits may outgrow the market, unlike Intel or MS.

]]>
By: windsorr https://www.radiofreemobile.com/vertical-industry-monkey-business/#comment-557 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:05:58 +0000 http://www.radiofreemobile.com/?p=1246#comment-557 Quite possibly the case….technologically the best bit of that ill-fated JV albeit with a slight tendency to put too much emphasis on quality of life!,,,,

]]>
By: Björn Ekelund https://www.radiofreemobile.com/vertical-industry-monkey-business/#comment-556 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 06:52:27 +0000 http://www.radiofreemobile.com/?p=1246#comment-556 I believe this to be one of the key reasons why Ericsson decided to re-integrate the the Cellular Modems Chip Business Unit from ST-Ericsson instead of simply closing it.

]]>